Issue No. 25 Winter 2006
Tools: Home
Tools for Housing and Economic Development
 
 
Maplewood Court



Our biggest challenge now is to control the site and cut down on the vandalism that occurs from time to time because of where we're located.

Maplewood Court, Bridgeport, Connecticut

Larry Kluetsch is executive director of the Mutual Housing Association of Southwestern Connecticut, the developer of Maplewood School Mutual Housing in Bridgeport, Connecticut. The initiative was the recipient of a $160,000 grant from the Bank's Affordable Housing Program in 1997.

Maplewood Court is 32 units of family housing on the west side of Bridgeport. The initiative involved the renovation of two 100-year-old school buildings. It's truly a beautiful property. It sat vacant for 10 years and was renovated in 1997. It came out wonderfully.

We were able to pull off this development with help from a lot of people, including the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston. While funding was there to develop the property, we knew we had limited funds to operate it. This makes it very difficult. There will always be financial restraints on how the property is run. This property has one of the highest per-unit costs of all our properties, and, given its location, we always try to offer moderate rents.

The development has some of the inefficiencies and financial constraints associated with a relatively small historic property. We always recognized that Maplewood Court was going to struggle because of this. Issues of efficiency come into play in managing the property because we're dealing with the renovation of two historic school buildings with wide hallways and lots of extra common space. The main building has 24 units, and the smaller building has eight units. Every classroom was basically made into a unit. We've developed an attractive courtyard between the two buildings.

Maplewood Court itself occupies part of a large block, which makes it a difficult site to control. Also, keeping the historic features of the buildings is a challenge to good property management. Maplewood has five entries into the buildings that have to be maintained to preserve the historic look of the building. This creates all kinds of security problems.

It's quite different from the way we managed our first property, Trinity Park in Stanford, another project assisted by the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston. When we took over that building we consolidated the entry points into one entry and one exit stairwell. This gave us more control over what happens in the building. Trinity Park is now one of our most successful and cohesive buildings, even though it's a seven-story building.

Our biggest challenge now is to control the site and cut down on the vandalism that occurs from time to time because of where we're located. The west side is one of the strongest neighborhoods in the city but it has pockets that are problematic. Maplewood Court is located in a pocket that has been going through changes. We are looking at adding control features, such as a security camera in the courtyard and gates and fencing.

We're also trying to get residents more involved. It always helps when you involve people and get them to take more responsibility for what is going on in the building. Addressing physical issues is easier than addressing the resident piece, particularly if the neighborhood is a challenge. Crime is down elsewhere, but it has been going up in Bridgeport. We're always on the front lines.

Getting the support of the other residents is important because we can't be there all the time. We want the residents to feel a sense of ownership, which is in line with the mutual model. If they walk down the sidewalk we want them to pick up pieces of paper and not throw paper down. It starts at this level.

If a resident knows that somebody is breaking a window we need to know who is doing it so we can deal with the problem. You have to create an environment where they feel safe to come forward. We always tell them that we're in it together. Vandalism hits them in the pocketbook. It costs money to fix a broken window, and in many cases the cost will be passed on to them.

Behavioral issues in the building are a problem from time to time, and we deal with it family by family. I'm more concerned about the 31 families that have to live in a disturbed environment than the one we have to evict for disturbing them. There's zero tolerance if drugs are involved. We address other issues - such as
letting too many people into the building or too much activity - by working with the residents. We tell them that maybe mutual housing and Maplewood Court are just not right for them and try to work with them to find alternative housing.

Family housing often involves behavioral issues involving kids and teenagers. This is the biggest challenge. The parents are working; the kids come home early from school and are probably alone in the house; they let in their friends and suddenly you have issues. As they get older and become teenagers it's not too hard for them to step over a line so that problems start to happen and something gets broken or there's a fight. Families can't be there all the time; families these days are struggling with jobs and being able to make enough money to live, so it's not always the parents' fault.

I like to say that 90 percent of our residents are great and 10 percent are troubled. But that 10 percent causes 90 percent of the problems and takes up 90 percent of our time.

We're very proud of the property. It's one of the most beautiful properties we have. This motivates people to want to keep it up. We're fortunate that our Bridgeport office is at Maplewood Court. Proximity is always an important factor in managing a building.

You need boots on the ground. We have a great committed group, but there are too few of them. For the nonprofits and affordable-housing managers, there's never enough money for management and oversight. That's the challenge.

If we've erred in the past, it's that we've focused too much on keeping our rents and costs down. We used to pat ourselves on the back for averaging maybe 1.5 percent a year in rent increases. But I think we've learned that that approach may not be the best one. If we're doing this effectively, rent has to increase sufficiently to cover the additional costs. If we're going to do this, we've got to be able to pay for it. That may mean residents will have to pay a little more, but hopefully the outcome will be a place they're proud of.

> Next: Haynes House

 

multimedia profiles
Rebuilding a Community Block by Block In the second installment of an ongoing profile, construction begins on the conversion of an historic mill complex into housing to help revive one of Providence's oldest neighborhoods.

housing events

Ground-Breaking John A. Moore, senior vice president, CRA officer at Bangor Savings Bank, addresses attendees at the Brick Hill Cottages ground-breaking in South Portland, Maine. Seated, from the left: John T. Eller. senior vice president / housing and community investment, Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston; Dale McCormick, director, Maine State Housing Authority; Rep. Thomas H. Allen (D-ME-1); and Dana Totman, president and CEO, Avesta Housing.
departments

2005 Round Two AHP Awards
2005 Round Two AHP Awards Summary
Housing News in Brief
Staff Changes at the Bank
Download the Print Version (PDF)


Tools Archive
Issue No. 24 Summer 2005
Issue No. 23 Winter 2005
Issue No. 22 Fall 2004