Issue No. 28 Fall 2007 Tools Home Tools for Housing and Economic Development
 
Martin Corona, senior community investment manager at the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston, speaking at the Bank-sponsored Green Building Forum.



MaineHousing has concluded that green building isn’t more costly and provides long-term benefits, particularly if residents are educated on use of these features.

 

The Bank Sponsors A Green Building Forum

As part of an ongoing effort to keep members and partners up-to-date on trends and developments in affordable housing, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston recently sponsored a forum on the growing importance of green building in housing construction in New England.

Green building refers to construction features such as energy-efficient heating systems and appliances, low-toxin building materials, and building designs that protect the environment. Energy conservation is a key strategy to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that scientists believe are causing global warming.

Last year’s forum included presentations by Paul Epstein, a medical doctor and director of Harvard Medical School’s Center for Health and the Global Environment; Ed Connelly, president of New Ecology, Inc.; and Dan Winters, managing principal at Evolution Partners. Representatives from state housing finance agencies across New England reported on the use of green building standards in the construction of affordable housing in their states.

Dr. Epstein noted that the increased burning of fossil fuels worldwide is causing an escalation in carbon dioxide (CO2) levels in the atmosphere and a rise in global temperatures. Higher levels of greenhouse gases such as CO2 are thought to be causing a rise in deep-ocean temperatures and alterations in ocean currents. Scientists believe that rising temperatures are also responsible for a spike in severe weather such as heat waves, droughts, floods, and hurricanes.

Air pollution, higher global temperatures, and extreme weather have consequences for health and the economy. Air pollution leads to a higher incidence of asthma, lung disease, and heart disease, while warmer temperatures and melting glaciers increase moisture in the atmosphere and the incidence of diseases such as malaria.

Use of green building techniques have the potential to slow the growth of CO2 in the atmosphere and global warming, but governments need to take action to promote their adoption, said Dr. Epstein, who believes that a carrot-and-stick approach will be the most effective way to promote green building in the region.

Mr. Connelly discussed the findings of a New Ecology report titled The Costs and Benefits of Green Affordable Housing. The report includes case-study analysis of the costs and benefits of green building in 16 affordable-housing developments around the country.

Mr. Connelly noted that total development costs for green projects ranged from 18 percent below to nine percent above the cost of conventional affordable housing. The report concludes that green developments require a small “green” premium of 2.42 percent in total development costs.

While some green features have the potential to increase the cost of housing, major savings from green development are reaped over a building’s 30-year operating cycle, according to the study. These costs, Mr. Connelly said,  “are real and in some cases substantial.”

Mr. Connelly said the movement toward green building is likely to escalate. He said energy-efficient structures improve occupant comfort and health while minimizing environmental impacts. As global warming becomes a more pressing social concern, the government will likely institute new regulations to control energy use. “I think we should try to anticipate these issues,” he said. “The key is to have [green building] be part of what you do from the beginning, from the moment of conception.”

Mr. Connelly noted that green building has been more widely used in market-rate housing than in affordable developments. He attributes affordable housing’s slowness to adopt green standards to per-unit cost caps, regulatory rigidity, and a finance system slow to recognize the long-term benefits of green building. Although the upfront costs of green developments may be higher than those of conventional developments, the long-term benefits of green building should far exceed those initial higher costs, Mr. Connelly said.

Dan Winters, managing principal of Evolution Partners, a Washington-based consulting firm, provided an overview of current underwriting practices, tools, and valuation models to help assess investment and lending associated with green buildings.

Noting that the five warmest years on record since 1890 have occurred since 1998, Mr. Winters said global warming is becoming an increasingly significant issue for developers. He said some investors are requesting technical information on the amount of CO2 emitted by a building and an assessment of the property’s risk exposure if new regulations are imposed in the future.

He said interest in green building continues to increase among real estate developers and added that green buildings are less risky investments because they tend to be more attractive to renters, earn higher rents, and have higher collateral value. The lease-up of green buildings significantly exceeds pro forma expectations, while occupancy, operations, and maintenance costs are consistently lower than their nongreen counterparts.

Mr. Winters said a recent study of LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design)-certified properties shows that 41 percent are owned by government entities, 28 percent by for-profit corporations, and 21 percent by nonprofit corporations.

Also participating in the forum were representatives from housing authorities throughout New England, who reported on the use of green building standards in their housing.

Daniel Brennan, director of development for MaineHousing, said all developments funded by the agency must now comply with its new Green Building Standards. The authority developed those standards by studying LEED and Energy Star standards and through outreaching to developers and architects (see story on page 6).
“These are good building practices,” said Donald McGilvery, construction services manager for MaineHousing. He said it’s important to incorporate green building standards early in the planning and design process.

MaineHousing has concluded that green building isn’t more costly and provides long-term benefits, particularly if residents are educated on use of these features. “We have all of these things going on, and it’s really exciting,” said Mr. McGilvery.

Mark Koppelkam, Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program Manager for the New Hampshire Housing Finance Authority, said rising construction costs have made it difficult for the New Hampshire authority to institute green building standards.

Mark Hirsch, manager of architectural and construction development for the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority (CHFA), noted that cost issues had been an obstacle to implementing green standards in his state. In 2007, however, CHFA implemented Green Design and Construction Standards for its multifamily rental housing.

Daniel Healey, design and construction manager at Rhode Island Housing, said his agency is promoting Energy Star standards, the Healthy Homes Program, and Sustainable Green Standards. He said the agency involves developers and architects in the early stages of Low Income Housing Tax Credit initiatives to ensure they adhere to Energy Star standards. He said 95 percent of Rhode Island Housing’s tax credit projects are adhering to these standards.

While Rhode Island hopes to eventually publish its own green building standards, it continues to wrestle with the issue of cost. And while many sponsors are attracted to green building design, they are also conscious of upfront costs that could diminish a development’s affordability.

In Massachusetts, all new buildings that receive funding from MassHousing must be Energy Star compliant. The agency also has a partnership with the Massachusetts Renewable Energy Trust, which provides support for clean energy projects across the state. Massachusetts has also been a leading promoter of smart growth and recently passed legislation (Chapter 40R) that allows communities to create special zoning overlay districts close to municipal centers for new affordable housing.

Pat Capalbo, vice president at member Wainwright Bank & Trust Company, said Wainwright Bank has been participating in housing projects that include green building features. “It’s coming up more and more, which is why I am here,” she said, adding that her bank’s mission includes promotion of environmental awareness. T